Gopal Balakrishnan is the author of The Enemy: An Intellectual Portrait of Carl Schmitt, and editor of Debating “Empire” and (with Benedict Anderson) Mapping . PDF download for Book Review: Gopal Balakrishnan, The Enemy: An Intellectual Portrait of, Article Information. Gopal Balakrishnan is a professor in the History of Consciousness Department at the University “The enemy: an intellectual portrait of Carl Schmitt”. Verso.

Author: Zuran Kinos
Country: Honduras
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Personal Growth
Published (Last): 21 March 2005
Pages: 385
PDF File Size: 2.76 Mb
ePub File Size: 3.6 Mb
ISBN: 136-3-98706-966-8
Downloads: 56804
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Tygolkree

Turning from his earlier suggestion that only a commissarial dictatorship was typically necessary, Schmitt came closer to endorsing sovereign dictatorship of an individual, not derived from the people, in opposition to the menace of proletarian revolution. Amazon Giveaway allows you to run promotional giveaways in order balakrishnn create buzz, reward your audience, and attract new followers and customers.

Politics is thus, at balakrisjnan core, not separate from the rest of life, but, ultimately, the way in which a political community determines its destiny, in opposition to those who hold incompatible beliefs, through violent conflict if necessary.

Gopal Balakrishnan, The Enemy: An Intellectual Portrait of Carl Schmitt – PhilPapers

Jeffrey Seitzer – – Greenwood Press. Born inof a provincial Roman Catholic family in the Rhineland, Schmitt studied jurisprudence which then included political science and political philosophy in Berlin in the early s. The book portrayed the Roman Church as the potential pivot around which liberalism and aggressively sovereign monarchs of the old regimes could be brought together, through its role in myth and in standing above and apart from the contending classes, as well as being representative of all classes and peoples.


That is, through his analysis, Schmitt concluded that the Weimar Constitution was wholly legitimate, even though it was the result of a sovereign dictatorship, because the sovereign dictator, the provisional legislative power, the pouvoir constituent the power that makes the constitutionexisted for a defined term and then dissolved itself. It is what tells you whether in this precise moment you should be smashing up banks or standing in elections. Essays on Carl Schmitt.

Matthias Lievens – – Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 1: Amazon Restaurants Food delivery from local restaurants. The writings of Carl Schmitt form what is arguably the most disconcerting, original, and yet still unfamiliar body of twentieth-century political thought. Citing articles via Google Scholar. Carl Schmitt, preeminent antiliberal, is that rare thing, the modern political philosopher relevant long after his time. It will not end well. This is the best all-around survey of and introduction to Carl Schmitt’s thought.

Liberalism, which believes that politics is a matter of pure rationality with a moral overlay, not only misses the point, but by being wrong, exacerbates the chances of and costs of conflict, especially by turning all conflict into a crusade where the enemy is evil, rather than just different.

East Dane Designer Men’s Fashion. After the war and the post-war revolutionary disturbances, the mainline left-center parties, over the objections of the defeated rightists and cutting out the violent Left, promulgated the Weimar constitution, in August of An Intellectual Portrait of Carl Schmitt.

Gopal Balakrishnan – Wikipedia

Rhe is a book which everyone interested in modern political theory should read. Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. He feared that parliamentary politics was foundationless – that it was, to steal a phrase from Steven Hawking, ‘just turtles all the way down.


Ships from and sold by Amazon. Thus, in many places today, especially on the Left, Schmitt is studied for his insights.

Sign in via your Institution Sign in. Please try again later.

Gopal Balakrishnan

To this extent, as I say, Schmitt is the correct type of reactionary: Kathrin Braun – – The European Legacy 17 1: Receive exclusive offers and updates from Oxford Academic. In the English-speaking world, he is terra incognita, a name associated with Nazism, the author of a largely untranslated oeuvre forming no recognizable This is an internal decision to each political community, not susceptible to rational discussion with those outside the community, and it is not a moral, but eney a practical, decision.

My library Help Advanced Book Search. In any event, the comparison is less than enlightening.

Opposed to the King were the Monarchomachists, part of a long tradition of political philosophy holding that a tyrannical or impious king could justly be overthrown, and that no extraordinary measures could be taken by the king without tyranny.

Get fast, free shipping with Amazon Prime.

Write a customer review. History of Western Philosophy.

American Historical Association members Sign in via society site. But I turned to Schmitt because his name kept coming up in modern books by leftists and was used by NeverTrumper Bill Kristol when trying to tar his opponents.

admin Food